To confuse things even further, we now have another wheel size: the 27.5" (or 650b). I have created a simple diagram to give a general picture of the positives and negatives of each wheel size. This is a very broad overview. For more detail checkout our other articles "26 or 29 You Choose" and "An introduction to 650b".
Tyres of the same size may come with lots of different markings: 28×1¼×15/8, 28×1¾×1¼ or 700×32C, for example, which are all 32-622. Even worse, the same or very similar markings can sometimes be found on completely different sizes of tyre: 26×1½ and 26x1.5. It might be supposed that these two tyres are both notionally 26" diameter
No, the rim size is different. 27.5(650b) has a bead seat diameter of 584mm. 26 in wheels have a bead seat diameter of 559mm. 27.5 tires won't fit 26 wheels, too loose. And 26 in tires you couldn't even begin to fit on 27.5 rims, they would be so tight.
I liked it better 2.35f and 2.2 rear on 21mm inner widths wheels compared to 2.8 front/rear on 35mm inner width wheels. The 27.5+ was sort of plush, but not fast and snappy. I preferred the fast and snappy more lively feel of 29. Also 29ers roll over root better. The 27.5+ will absorb, but not roll over as well.
For actual mountain biking, I would 110% go for a 27.5. For cruising around town, a 26 is no problem at all. Saying this based on my experiences of flying or not flying over the bars with different wheel sizes while mountain biking, and with a lot of commuting experience as well. kopsis. •.
09Xsn. z0uje082bu.pages.dev/416z0uje082bu.pages.dev/69z0uje082bu.pages.dev/421z0uje082bu.pages.dev/181z0uje082bu.pages.dev/413z0uje082bu.pages.dev/564z0uje082bu.pages.dev/340z0uje082bu.pages.dev/223
difference between 26 27.5 and 29